• Users Online: 682
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 388-389

Laissez-faire: A blessing in disguise during pandemic

1 Department of Ophthalmology, MN Eye Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Arunai Medical College, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission30-Mar-2021
Date of Decision24-Jun-2021
Date of Acceptance28-Jun-2021
Date of Web Publication21-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pratheeba Devi Nivean
MN Eye Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/tjosr.tjosr_31_21

Rights and Permissions

Laissez-faire is a technique of natural healing of raw wound. It has not become popular or not considered as the first-line treatment in view of the unexpected cosmetic outcomes. However, this technique is being advised regularly for certain lesions where the regular reconstruction techniques are not feasible. We present this case in which the regular reconstruction failed and as a blessing in disguise during the pandemic natural healing happened in a beautiful way.

Keywords: Laissez-faire, lid reconstruction, natural healing

How to cite this article:
Nivean PD, Nivean M, Sayee M. Laissez-faire: A blessing in disguise during pandemic. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res 2021;59:388-9

How to cite this URL:
Nivean PD, Nivean M, Sayee M. Laissez-faire: A blessing in disguise during pandemic. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 10];59:388-9. Available from: https://www.tnoajosr.com/text.asp?2021/59/4/388/333167

  Introduction Top

Lid defects posttumor excision are conventionally repaired by lid reconstruction. An alternative to surgery is wound healing by secondary intention and is called laissez-faire. This technique was first described in 1957. However, the fear of unexpected cosmetic and functional outcome has not made this technique very popular. We present a case to illustrate the way we managed a large defect and how the natural healing helped him when the graft underwent necrosis.

  Case Report Top

A 55-year-old male came to us with complaints of swelling in his left upper lid for 6 months. The swelling was small to start with, and then, it gradually progressed to attain the present size. The lesion also extended to the lateral aspect of the lower lid. On examination, the swelling measured 20 mm × 5 mm in the upper lid and 8 mm × 3 mm in the lower lid [Figure 1]. The lid margin architecture was lost, with loss of lashes over the lesion. Clinically, the findings were strongly suggestive of sebaceous gland carcinoma. There was no regional lymphadenopathy. Based on the clinical findings, the patient was advised excision biopsy with margin clearance under frozen section and lid reconstruction in the same sitting. The patient underwent excision biopsy with 5 mm margin. Margin clearance was obtained, and then, we decided to reconstruct.
Figure 1: (a) External photograph of the patient in upgaze. (b) External photograph in straight gaze showing the lesion

Click here to view

Only one-fourth of the upper lid was left behind while one-fourth of the lower lid was lost after the excision. The lateral canthus was excised. There was loss of anterior and posterior lamella in the lower lid and upper lid. Hence, we planned buccal mucosal graft for posterior lamellae and forehead flap for anterior lamellae.

Buccal mucosa was harvested from the mouth after measuring the amount of graft tissue required. The forehead flap was raised and the anterior lamellae were sutured to the posterior lamellae. The lateral canthus was then formed [Figure 2]. Postoperative period was uneventful with no lagophthalmos and corneal exposure. Lid sutures were removed on the 10th day. During the 1st month follow-up, there were sloughing and graft rejection in the upper and lower lid [Figure 3]. The unhealthy tissue was removed, and the patient was examined again. There were lagophthalmos and exposure keratopathy, so we advised repeat reconstruction. Due to extended pandemic, the patient was lost to follow-up. When we reviewed the patient after 3 months to our surprise by natural healing (laissez-faire), the defect had healed well and the lagophthalmos had reduced with no exposure keratopathy [Figure 4].
Figure 2: (a) Pictorial depiction of the eye showing bare area after excision biopsy. (b) Posterior lamella reconstruction with mucous membrane graft. (c) Anterior lamella with forehead flap, which is dissected to two near the base and used for both the lids. (d) Lateral canthal formation

Click here to view
Figure 3: (a) External photograph showing graft necrosis. (b) External photograph after removal of slough showing exposure and lagophthalmos

Click here to view
Figure 4: (a) External photograph showing complete closure of the eye due to laissez-faire. (b) External photograph in straight gaze

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

Majority of surgeons allow healing by secondary intention for medial canthal and lesions of nose, but they do not prefer natural healing for lower lid lesions for cosmetic reasons. However, Morton[1] had reported this technique being used for 75% lid loss. He had explained that the result is quite remarkable that this technique can be seriously considered for elderly patients and patients with systemic problems.

The role of secondary intention following excision of periocular skin tumors has been extensively studied by Shankar et al.[2] They reported good results in 92%, and the common complications they encountered were scarring, granulation tissue, ectropion, hypertrophied scar, and prolonged healing time.

The main indications for this approach are for medial canthal lesions, after radiotherapy, unsuitable skin, in patients with precancerous conditions such as xeroderma pigmentosa, patients with poor health, and unfit for general anesthesia.[3]

In our case, after the primary procedure, the graft and flap underwent necrosis, so the slough was removed and we advised secondary procedure as there was exposure of cornea and lower sclera. However, with time and natural healing with granulation tissue, the patient did not require secondary procedure.

  Conclusion Top

Healing by natural intention should be considered as an alternative to certain lesions.

This technique always has a small risk of secondary surgical intervention if the healing is not adequate. Although it is not advisable for upper lid defects due to chances of exposure keratitis, we can still consider this for smaller upper lid defects.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Morton J. Secondary intention healing in lower eyelid reconstruction—a valuable treatment option. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1921-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
Shankar J, Nair RG, Sullivan SC. Management of peri-ocular skin tumours by laissez-faire technique: Analysis of functional and cosmetic results. Eye 2002:16:50-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
Collin JR. Eye lid reconstruction and tumour management. In: Colin JR, editor. A Manual of Systematic Eye Lid Surgery. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh; 1989.  Back to cited text no. 3


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Case Report
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal